http://abcnews.go.com/video/playerindex?id=4989095
Most people are unaware that they have the right to choose which auto glass company performs their auto glass repair or replacement. Some insurance companies try to “steer” auto glass work to their preferred repair facilities. This practice is not only ILLEGAL, but usually results in poor workmanship, poor quality materials, and an overall bad customer experience. If your insurance company tries to steer you to an auto glass shop that you’ve never heard of, give Portsmouth Glass a call. We can come to you and fix your damaged glass on-site and repair or replace the glass with quality materials and expert service.
The practice of job steering, typically results in a bad overall experience. When an auto glass shop has jobs steered to them, they tend to aim to please the insurance company (who’s bringing them the work) rather than the policy holder. With this mind-frame, it’s easy to understand why policy holders can have bad experiences when their insurance company steers them to a facility. In these cases, the policy holders questions, concerns and demands take a backseat to the insurance company.
In addition to poor quality service, the policy holder is also at risk to having substandard materials used in the repair and replacement. With jobs flooding in through illegal job steering, it’s easy for a repair facility to sacrifice quality materials and customer satisfaction for more profits, because the repair shop is focused on moving jobs in and out as quickly as possible. To ensure you’re not a victim of shops like these, we encourage you to research your repair facility before committing to them.
The popular TV newsmagazine 20/20 aired a segment on windshield installation safety Friday, February 25, and the auto glass industry finally saw the “safety issue” of windshield replacement get some national exposure. The show was done in a ‘consumer awareness’ tone, with on-air personality Arnold Diaz, who started with the fact that windshield replacement is ‘complicated’ and auto glass installers do not have to be licensed or certified.
The segment said experts have claimed that millions of windshield replacements have been installed improperly. The story stressed that the windshield is an important vehicle component, perhaps saving your life in the event of an accident. Video of crash and rollover tests, as well as an air bag detonation, was shown to demonstrate the key role of the windshield.
The tragic and up-close human toll, reportedly the result of a bad windshield replacement, was an interview with a woman whose neck was broken in an auto accident. Her vehicle had rolled over, the glass popped out, and the roof crushed in, rendering her a paraplegic. The vehicles’ windshield had been replaced four years previously by a local glass shop. The woman’s family settled for 2 million dollars after suing the replacement shop. The woman’s’ husband said the company forgot to use a secondary primer, causing the sealant not to harden.
After hearing from auto glass experts that windshields are often replaced improperly due to installers being “sloppy” or “not being trained well enough”, 20/20 showed windshield replacements by three different shops, in three different cities, all mobile installations.
The following day 20/20 had the windshield removed and claimed the urethane easily came loose, indicating little or no use of primers.
One of the installers claimed that the installation just witnessed was a ‘bad example’ and they had been ‘real busy’ and just ’slammed down 12 jobs’. The company commented that the installers are certified and regularly trained.
The second installation took place in Spokane, Washington, where a Safelite Autoglass installer was filmed cleaning the windshield with only a rag, and not any cleaning agent. The company terminated the installer, and told 20/20 that it was an ‘isolated incident’ and that the mistakes did not necessarily pose a safety risk.
After an installation by Diamond Triumph in Minneapolis, Minnesota, the “customer” said the technician told him, that after he “slapped on the glue” and put the windshield in, the vehicle was ready to go. Confronted with his purported statements, the installer denied it, saying the car should ‘probably sit for a while’, later clarifying the time as “a couple of hours”. A graphic from sealant manufacturer Essex showed ten hours on their safe drive-a-way chart for U-418. The company claimed that 20/20 cameras caused their installer to be nervous and give erroneous information.
For expert opinion on the story, 20/20 consulted with Mitch Becker, of ABRA Auto Glass & Body, and Steve Coyle of the Performance Achievement Group, a leading auto glass training company.
At the close of the segment, Barbara Walters asked Arnold Diaz just what consumers can do to “get the right kind of treatment for their windshield?” Mr. Diaz responded that experts say they might want to ask if they are certified by the National Glass Association. He commented that although that doesn’t give a guarantee, it does give the consumer a better chance. Diaz recommended that they also ask the installer, and not just the shop, about being certified.
Ms. Walters also asked about consumers checking with their insurance agent for a recommendation for a shop. Mr. Diaz responded that “that could be a problem”, as sometimes insured’s are steered to a place that is cheaper, and that could mean cutting corners.
|
|
||
|
||


